
You may believe that your business is superior to your competitors in some way. Maybe you offer a more affordable price point or a better product overall. For whatever reason, you believe that your company is ultimately the better choice for your customer. After all, if you don’t believe in yourself, there’s no reason why a potential client would believe in you.
Even if this may be the case, it is probably not in your best interest to directly attack your competitors in your ad campaigns. You inevitably see these kinds of commercials around election time, and it is not uncommon to see Coca-Cola unleash a marketing campaign that says that their product is better in some way than the equivalent product from Pepsi. The automotive world isn’t all that different in this respect either, as you’ve surely been bombarded with ads that say something about being more fuel efficient than X or having a better crash test rating than Y.
Ultimately, these forms of advertising can work against you. By mentioning competitors in your marketing campaign, you are simultaneously providing them with free advertising. It’s possible that your potential customers weren’t even considering that particular competitor and now you have piqued their interest enough to warrant further investigation. By attacking your competitors in your ads, you are also presenting a not-so-friendly image to the public. Would you want to deal with a firm that was spiteful and negative? I know I wouldn’t.
The next time you design a marketing campaign for your company, you may want to avoid the negative advertising paradigm. It is likely not in your favor to do so.





Matthew Schmoll
June 12, 2008 2:04 pm
Don’t forget the most blatant example. The Mac commercials. Because of them I stay away from Macs.