Reciprocal Links Cause For Google Banning

Posted on August 10th, 2007

GoogleFrom time to time Google will update their Webmaster Help Center. The Help Center is a guide for people who are trying to optimize their sites. Recently Google issued a new warning about reciprocal links being cause for being banned.

Here is what Google says…

“However, some webmasters engage in link exchange schemes and build partner pages exclusively for the sake of cross-linking, disregarding the quality of the links, the sources, and the long-term impact it will have on their sites.”

So if you have anything that even remotely sounds like the above I suggest you remove it now. I would also suggest reviewing those link trains that go around to game Google.

What do you think of this new policy?

Posted in Marketing Tips | | | Digg This | del.icio.us | Technorati


Related Topics:
Discussion: Google Witch Hunt?
Wordpress Wednesdays: Getting Back on the Technorati Saddle
Marketing 101: How Will Google’s Crackdown on Paid Links Affect You?
Wordpress Wednesdays: The Move to Google Blogsearch
Impending Death of Text Link Ads

RSS feed

14 Comments

Gravatar
Comment by Matt Propst Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-10 22:53:26

Doesn’t this policy counteract any reason behind the idea of link exchanges?

Gravatar
Comment by blogadmin
2007-08-11 10:18:53

Yes they believe that it is gaming the system.

Gravatar
Comment by Matt Propst Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-11 10:32:31

I’d say its a fair assumption that 1/4 of just about any blogroll is screwed then. (Myself included)

 
 
 
Gravatar
Comment by Jeff Kee Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-12 02:04:05

It’s such an arbitrary thing to decide whether the links are just for link exchanging, or because the pages have relevancy.

Gravatar
Comment by blogadmin
2007-08-12 02:04:49

I agree it sounds like a witch hunt to me.

 
 
Gravatar
Comment by Sandy Lincoln
2007-08-13 11:55:25

I sell custom jewelry and I’ve link exchanged with hundreds of related websites over the years. I think its outrageos that a search engine would say how I can obtain traffic aside from search returns. I used to think Google was great for webmasters. now I am just disgusted with google.. they are getting to powerful and are upsetting decent site operators like me.

well I dont take it.. I will keep my links pages online. I could survive without traffic from google and will continue to obtain decent traffic through relevent reciprocal linking.

if they are going to continue to make stupid comments like this, the least thing they could do was be more specific and not lump all types of link exchange into the same basket. google you have lost lots of credibility with me.

 
Gravatar
Comment by Christian Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-13 17:48:48

Reciprocal Links go against everything google is trying to do with google adwords.

And yes they (google) have gotten much to powerful.

 
Gravatar
Comment by Matt Propst Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-13 18:38:06

To take up the Devil’s Advocate for a split second I can see where Google is coming from to a degree…

But then back to the rational world that existed pre-Google Empire…. What about friends who link to one another’s sites because they are just friends. Not everyone’s out to make a buck and get the top spot on Google. (That’s nice and i’d be lying if i say i don’t, but its not all Google and Adsense/Adwords)

Gravatar
Comment by blogadmin
2007-08-13 18:40:03

I wonder how they are going to police it.

Gravatar
Comment by Christian Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-14 07:06:45

Lots of cheap labor in Mexico, India and China. ;)

Other questions to ask g00gle come to mind.

1. Define What is a Paid Link
2. How Will you Identify a Paid Link?
3. How Will you Monitor and Mediate?
4. What about these blog contests BlueFur and john chow have, will that cause bans?

My biggest fear with what g00gle is doing, would be that a competitor sees a great opportunity to sabotage my sites by filling a false claim.
Will they investigate or just plain out ban like they do to so many with adw0rds.?

Whats the next step? g00gle.

Banning people for using keywords?
For having not enough pictures and too much text?
For having links to g00gles competitors search engines?

With that much power they can do anything. And the will.

I wonder if we should ban g00gle ourselves.. Imagine that.. they wouldnt have any websites left to ban. :P

Its not like their isnt at least another 100 search engines…. right?

Gravatar
Comment by Matt Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-14 17:15:21

I’ve found that Google is by far the best search engine. It’s easy to find exactly what you need, and it’s quite a fresh index. New pages can show up in the index within an hour or two usually, not a day or two.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Gravatar
Comment by blogadmin
2007-08-14 22:32:34

Although I find for local searchs all of them to be a nightmare.

A Search Engine who can help me find a local business w/o using the Yellow Pages will win my daily searches.

 
Gravatar
Comment by Christian Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-15 06:41:25

I find that clusty does a great job at finding local business.

 
Gravatar
Comment by Matt Subscribed to comments via email
2007-08-15 11:44:15

Choosing “pages in Canada” helps a little.

 
 
 
 
 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

© 2007 BlueFur Hosting | Privacy Policy
Theme by Unique Blog Designs